﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>FilmScope: Recent Comments</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:27:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on The Taking of Pelham 123 (7 of 10)</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org/2009/06/12/the-taking-of-pelham-123-7-of-10.aspx#comment-2349511</link><dc:creator>Lee Ann</dc:creator><description>After seeing the origional, it's hard to imagine anything else comparing. The classic version should stand alone in the history of cinema.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theblog.filmscope.org/2009/06/12/the-taking-of-pelham-123-7-of-10.aspx#comment-2349511</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:16:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Netflix Pick of the Week: August 8-14, 2009</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org/2009/08/05/netflix-pick-of-the-week-august-814-2009.aspx#comment-2346956</link><dc:creator>Lee Ann</dc:creator><description>I remember the old GI Joe! Those were fun times!</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theblog.filmscope.org/2009/08/05/netflix-pick-of-the-week-august-814-2009.aspx#comment-2346956</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:38:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Vantage Point: There Is Little Point To This Vantage</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/07/vantage-point-there-is-little-point-to-this-vantage.aspx#comment-1801676</link><dc:creator>boediger</dc:creator><description>And then there is the “big twist” that is actually put on the trailers, which completely turns this quackish movie into an even dumber snooze. The entire movie feels like it’s kidding itself just how smart and cool it really is. What they don’t understand is that trying so hard to be either smart or cool doesn’t makes you either. Just look at movies like Basic that thought the same way and was pronounced dead in the water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.boediger.net/&gt;boediger&lt;/a&gt;</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/07/vantage-point-there-is-little-point-to-this-vantage.aspx#comment-1801676</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:33:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Dune To Be Remade...Again</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/18/dune-to-be-remadeagain.aspx#comment-1600929</link><dc:creator>ken vaughan</dc:creator><description>Dune to be remade? let's hope so and give it a big budget,loads of talent and time to get it right -it's a must.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/18/dune-to-be-remadeagain.aspx#comment-1600929</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:19:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Horton Hears A Who: Who's New View Won't Make You Blue</title><link>http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/15/horton-hears-a-who-whos-new-view-wont-make-you-blue.aspx#comment-957477</link><dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator><description>Dr. Seuss is classic; after seeing Horton Hears a Who i remembered how much he packs into relatively simple storylines... they didn't add much to the original story either except for the usual Jim Carreyisms.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://theblog.filmscope.org/2008/03/15/horton-hears-a-who-whos-new-view-wont-make-you-blue.aspx#comment-957477</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:07:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>